Objectives of TEQIP Phase I
The broad objectives of the Programme as given below
have been derived from the National Policy on Education (NPE-1986 as revised
in 1992):
|
To
create an environment in which engineering institutions selected under
the Programme can achieve their own set targets for excellence and
sustain the same with autonomy and accountability. |
|
To
support development plans including synergistic networking and services
to community and economy of competitively selected institutions for
achieving higher standards. |
|
To
improve efficiency and effectiveness of the technical education management
system in the States and institutions selected under the Programme. |
Important Dates
| i)
EFC approval |
August
16, 2002 |
| ii)
Cabinet approval |
December
19, 2002 |
| iii)
Signing of Programme Agreement with World Bank |
|
1st
cycle States
2nd cycle States |
February
04, 2003
April 12, 2004 |
| iv)
Effectiveness of the Programme |
March
12, 2003 |
|
v) Closing of the Programme |
March
31, 2009 |
Selection
of States and Institutions
Selection
of institutions was carried out through a two-step process
|
First
step, eligibility of applicant institutions was determined at
State/BTE level, separately for Lead and Network Institutions. |
|
Second
step, Proposal from clusters of institutions (each cluster comprising
a lead institution and 3-4 networked institution)-based on their
vision, strategies and action plans were selected through a
national level competition. |
Accreditation
was also mandatory component for inclusion in the programme. For
judging academic attainment, some parameters were designed and benchmarks
values were assigned to each parameter. The maximum score was 68.
To be eligible for the status of a Lead Institutions, an applicant
institution must score 51 or more marks. In case of Network Institution,
the benchmark was 34.
|
|
No. of Lead Institutions: |
40
(Centrally Funded Institutions 16 + State Institutions 24) |
| No.
of Network Institutions: |
87
(Centrally Funded Institutions 2 + State Institutions 85) |
|
Total No. of Institutions |
127
|
In
the first cycle the following 6 States and 5 Centrally Funded Institutions
have been selected:
|
States |
Centrally
Funded Institutions |
1.
Haryana
2. Himachal Pradesh
3. Kerala
4. Madhya Pradesh
5. Maharashtra
6. Uttar Pradesh
|
1.
MNIT, Allahabad
2. NIT, Calicut
3. NIT, Kurukshetra
4. VNIT, Nagpur
5. MANIT, Bhopal
|
In the second cycle following 7 States and 13 Centrally Funded Institutions
have been selected:
|
States |
Centrally
Funded Institutions |
1.
Andhra Pradesh
2. Gujarat
3. Jharkhand
4. Karnataka
5. Tamil Nadu
6. Uttarakhand
7. West Bengal
|
1.
NIT, Rourkela
2. NIT, Trichy
3. NIT, Warangal
4. NIT, Srinagar
5. NIFFT, Ranchi
6. SVNIT, Surat
7. NIT, Durgapur
8. NIT, Surathkal
9. DBRANIT, Jalandhar
10. NIT, Jamshedpur
11. NIT, Silchar
12. MNIT, Jaipur
13. NIT, Hamirpur
|
PROGRAMME COST AND
FUNDING MECHANISM
The original allocation for the project was 189 million SDRs. An amount
of 26.529 million SDRs was deducted from the project by GoI/World Bank
for Tsunami relief activities reducing the allocation to 162.471 million
SDRs. Correspondingly the project in INRs got reduced and all States/CFIs
allocations were also reduced. The funds released and expenditure incurred
by CFIs and States for TEQIP Phase I is given below:
| S.
No. |
Centrally
Funded Institution/NPIU/States |
Project
Life Allocation
(Figures
in Million Rs.) |
Cumulative
Expenditure
(Figures
in Million Rs.) |
Disbursement
(Figures
in Million Rs.) |
| 1 |
MNNIT,
ALLAHABAD |
170.000 |
170.000 |
170.000 |
| 2 |
MANIT,
BHOPAL |
201.200 |
200.267 |
200.267 |
| 3 |
NIT, CALICUT |
211.606 |
211.606 |
211.606 |
| 4 |
NIT, DURGAPUR |
210.000 |
210.000 |
210.000 |
| 5 |
NIT, HAMIRPUR |
183.634 |
183.700 |
179.717 |
| 6 |
MNIT, JAIPUR |
85.394 |
85.394 |
85.394 |
| 7 |
DBRANIT,
JALANDHAR |
102.700 |
102.700 |
102.700 |
| 8
|
NIT, JAMSHEDPUR
|
93.729
|
88.484
|
88.485
|
| 9 |
NIT, KURUKSHETRA |
187.513 |
177.193 |
176.392 |
| 10 |
VNIT, NAGPUR |
200.000 |
200.000 |
200.000 |
| 11 |
NIFFT,
RANCHI |
93.819 |
90.810 |
90.810 |
| 12 |
NIT, ROURKELA |
152.796 |
152.700 |
152.700 |
| 13 |
NIT, SILCHAR |
126.780 |
126.800 |
126.780 |
| 14 |
NIT, SRINAGAR |
79.252 |
75.729 |
75.719 |
| 15 |
SVNIT,
SURAT |
229.300 |
229.286 |
229.300 |
| 16 |
NIT, SURATHKAL |
218.654 |
218.654 |
218.654 |
| 17 |
NIT, TIRUCHIRAPALLI |
200.000 |
200.000 |
200.000 |
| 18 |
NIT, WARANGAL |
194.100 |
194.100 |
194.100 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
NPIU
|
125.000 |
54.155 |
54.155 |
| |
SUB
TOTAL (A) |
3065.477 |
2971.578 |
2966.779 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
ANDHRA
PRADESH |
1452.834 |
1451.154 |
1451.154 |
| 2 |
GUJARAT |
503.703 |
498.393 |
498.496 |
| 3 |
HARYANA |
326.860 |
322.707 |
320.885 |
| 4 |
HIMACHAL
PRADESH |
79.953 |
79.452 |
79.452 |
| 5 |
JHARKHAND |
318.700 |
318.700 |
318.700 |
| 6 |
KARNATAKA |
1624.757 |
1606.577 |
1604.898 |
| 7 |
KERALA |
529.765 |
529.950 |
529.950 |
| 8 |
MADHYA
PRADESH |
458.476 |
444.321 |
441.297 |
| 9 |
MAHARASHTRA |
1625.594 |
1625.239 |
1612.571 |
| 10 |
TAMIL NADU |
961.630 |
954.680 |
954.251 |
| 11 |
UTTARAKHAND |
349.951 |
349.073 |
346.835 |
| 12 |
UTTAR PRADESH |
625.060 |
621.262 |
616.433 |
| 13 |
WEST BENGAL |
1470.970 |
1468.096 |
1455.234 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
SUB
TOTAL (B) |
10328.253 |
10269.604 |
10230.156 |
| |
TOTAL
(A+B) |
13393.730 |
13241.182 |
13196.935 |
Major achievements during the Project Period
| 1. |
89
new PG programs started in emerging areas
|
| 2. |
93%
courses are either accredited or under assessment for accreditation
|
| 3. |
50%
graduates with high academic performance (>75% marks)
|
| 4. |
76%
graduates placed through campus interviews with average annual salary
of Rs 2.90 lac
|
| 5. |
13,389
students admitted in ME/MTech programs during last year
|
| 6. |
587
PhDs awarded during last year in project institutions
|
| 7. |
88%
of the sanctioned faculty positions and 78% of the staff positions
filled.
|
| 8. |
180
Patents obtained and another 367 filed
|
| 9. |
37,542
research papers published
|
| 10. |
Grant
of autonomy:
Academic
Autonomy: fully implemented in 81 institutions and substantial in
40
Financial Autonomy: 110 full and 17
substantial
Administrative Autonomy : 102 full and
25 substantial
Managerial Autonomy: 112 full and 15
substantial
|
| 11. |
Block
grant : One State has provided in full and 9 States in partial
|
| 12. |
All
institutions have BOGs
|
| 13. |
Governance
is with stakeholders' participation
|
| 14. |
Four
Funds i.e. Corpus Fund, Staff Development Fund, Depreciation Fund
and Maintenance Fund created in all TEQIP institutions and augmented
with substantial amount
|
| 15. |
All
curricula revised and all syllabi updated in all programme institutions
|
| 16. |
Campus
wide networking established in all institutions
|
Significant best practices
| 1. |
Flexibility
in the pace of learning - NIT Warangal
|
| 2. |
Community
service cell - NIT Hamirpur
|
| 3. |
Integrated
Institute Automation System - NIT Durgapur
|
| 4. |
MIS
for online admission test - SGSITS Indore
|
| 5. |
Insurance
coverage for students - BMS College of Engineering Bangalore
|
| 6. |
Component
manufacturing for industries - NMAM Institute of Technology Nitte
|
| 7. |
Cost
sharing book bank scheme for students - College of Engineering Chengannur
|
Other Completed Projects :: TECH ED I,
TECH ED II and TECH ED III
| |
